Computer Security Viewed as Public Health: Microsoft's security chief Scott Charney has published a very provocative thought piece about whether a better approach to infected computers might be network quarantine just like we do with public health and people who have contracted a serious infectious disease. There is in fact a lot of knowledge about what machines are infected. Both Trend and McAfee now have elaborate Cloud based threat intelligence systems, and are using them to revolutionize how they do end-point security. Both know a lot about infected machines and the BotNets that control them because that strongly influences how you view those machines as threat sources when they try to connect or send you email. The unanswered question has been what to do about these infected machines other than to be wary of them. Quarantine is a clear constraint on a sick person's individual freedom, and yet it's a socially accepted practice in freedom loving democracies. Why shouldn't we deal with computer infection in the same way? Without societal agreement, service providers would be left with angry users and costly support if they tried to quarantine systems, so they don't. Might that all change if we adopted a quarantine model for computers to as a society?
